Shalom. I know you didn't get into the shita of the Chazon Ish in the Rosh, but do you have an explanation of how the Chazon Ish reconciles his idea that the Rosh agrees with the Rashb"a (that the bracha is not Shehakol if the primary intent is for the liquid) with the T'shuvos HaRosh that the Beis Yosef brings in s. 205 that the achronim are medayik to say that the Rosh holds that one only says the fruit/vegetable bracha on the liquid if the main intent was for the solid? Does he argue on that diyuk? Does he agree to the diyuk but holds that it is only relevant when he will consume both the liquid and solid - then the primary intent is determinant - but if one will only consume the liquid even the Rosh agrees that it is not Shehakol?

<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;">Great question. I don&rsquo;t know.</span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="mso-ansi-language: EN-US;">Tizku l&rsquo;mitzvos</span></p>