Finishing the Job

Speaker:
Ask author
Date:
August 12 2005
Downloads:
0
Views:
330
Comments:
0
 
The Talmud records a dispute as to the nature of the liability for smoothing rocks, for making a hole in a chicken coop, and for driving a peg into the handle of a hoe. According to Rav, one who does these actions is liable for “Boneh” (building). According to Shmuel, he is liable for “Makeh b'Patish”.

As R. Asher Weiss (Minchat Asher, Shabbat, 83:2) discusses, commentaries differ as to the thrust of their dispute. Both potential melakhot may be at the center of the issue: perhaps Rav’s position is driven by the belief that “Makeh B’Patish” is inapplicable in this case; while Shmuel’s position may be motivated by the understanding that “Boneh” is inapplicable.

The first possibility, that Makeh B’Patish is inapplicable, has in itself a few possible explanations. As understood by some rishonim (see Meiri, Yereim #112, Mordechai), Makeh B’Patish only applies to adding a finished touch to an already functioning product. An act that completes the object itself would not qualify as Makeh B’Patish. According to the Chazon Ish (51:14), though, the issue is that Boneh and Makeh B’Patish are mutually exclusive: Makeh B’Patish applies only when Boneh doesn’t, and vice versa; thus, the dispute between Rav and Shmuel. Boneh itself is a controversial topic, when applied to utensils rather than buildings: the question of whether Boneh is relevant to utensils is one debated in several places in the Talmud, and perhaps here as well (see Rabbeinu Chananel).

Gemara:

Collections: Rabbi Feldman Mini Shiur (Daf)

References: Shabbat: 102b  

    More from this:
    Comments
    0 comments
    Leave a Comment
    Title:
    Comment:
    Anonymous: 

    Learning on the Marcos and Adina Katz YUTorah site is sponsored today by Ron Zanger l'ilui nishmos יהושע בן אהרון ומרים בת חיים ז״ל לברכה and by Sara and Eric Pollak l'zecher nishmas Moshe ben Yehuda and Shifra bas Menachem Mendel