Tools for Brisk, defining the nature of the Din: Is it Absence (i.e. non-inclusion)? Or is it applying the rules of implementation (i.e. impediment or confrontation)?

Speaker:
Ask speaker
Date:
December 19 2012
Length:
55min 26s
Downloads:
32
Views:
494
Comments:
0

Series: Daily Shiur

Venue: Kew Gardens Hills Kew Gardens Hills

Gemara:

Collections: Rabbi Berzon: Tools of Brisk

Description

Non inclusion in the obligation of Tfillin (e.g. someone who has no arms) or the obligation of Tefilla (e.g. in the case of someone who is Osek BeTzarchei Tzibbur or an Onen) is not the same as a "blockage" that prevents one who is obligated from fulfilling his Chovat Gavra. An ones (mitigating circumstances) will daven a Tefillas Tashlumin. The melacha of Kevuras HaMes is included in the Isurim of Y"T Sheini. This confrontations must be resolved. The Gra"m Solo believed that Kevura is not included in Isurei Y"T Sheini. The Gra"ch taught that Pikuach Nefesh is not a confrontation; there is no Shabbos in this situation! Why is a debt not transferable? Absence of ownership or the impediment of a ma'aseh kinyan? The dif is shtar. Metatltilin

    More from this:
    Comments
    0 comments
    Leave a Comment
    Title:
    Comment:
    Anonymous: 

    Learning on the Marcos and Adina Katz YUTorah site is sponsored today by the Goldberg and Mernick families to mark the yahrzeit of Samuel M. Goldberg, R’ Shmuel Meir ben R’ Eliyahu HaCohen z”l