Description
For Bava Metzia 15a-b we continue analyzing Shmuel's view regarding the rights of the buyer when the field he purchased was confiscated by either the נגזל or the lender (who lent money to the seller). Does the buyer have a right to collect from the seller even the appreciation of the field during the period subsequent to the sale? In the case of a stolen property there is an issue of Ribbis since the seller is holding on to the monies of the buyer and now is returning a greater sum than he had received from the seller. This does not apply in the case of the lender since there the sale was 100% valid! When does the rule of Ribbis known as סאה בסאה apply? Are there exceptions to this prohibition? Must the lender reimburse the buyer for יציאה?
0 comments Leave a Comment