For Masechet Bava Kamma 112a the sugya addresses the issue of accepting testimony against a קטן, when can such testimony be valid? Is this identical with עדות שלא בפני בעל דין? Here in the case of קטן there is no בעל דין to be had; in the cases of a גדול we have a בעל דין but there is a technical barrier which prevents the בעל דבר from being there at the moment of testimony. We will discuss the case of a קטן who locked the plaintiff out of the house or confiscated the property of the plaintiff.
To contact us with any comments, suggestions or requests, please click here
YUTorah ® Online is made possible by the generosity of Marcos and Adina Katz and is coordinated by Yeshiva University's Center for the Jewish Future . It offers more than 240,000 shiurim via webcast in audio, video and text formats by our Roshei Yeshiva and other YU luminaries. The opinions and views expressed are solely those of the author or lecturer and should not be attributed to Yeshiva University.
0 comments Leave a Comment