![Rabbi Tanchum Cohen](https://cdnyutorah.cachefly.net/_images/roshei_yeshiva/tani_cohen.jpg)
- Rabbi Tanchum Cohen
- Date:
-
Series:
Five Minute Halacha
Venue: NCSY Kollel
Gemara:Halacha:History:Machshava:Holidays: - Duration: 4 min
Recording cut off at end. העיר א' מבני החבורה לגבי ביהכנ"ס בזה"ז - דהמנהג הנפוץ לקבוע לכא' אתי לפי רש"י ותוס', דבזה"ז איכא רשימת "חברי" ביהכנ"ס, וא"כ יש בעלים מיוחדים אפי' בכרכים.
4 comments Leave a Comment
Author: False == 1 ? Anonymous : Yitzchak Falk #44;
According to the position of Rashi and Tosafot, in which a village shul is obligated a mezuzah and a city shul is not obligated because of viewing the ownership of the village shul as a partnership rather than corporate ownership, would a contemporary urban American shul that is clearly owned by the members of the shul, yet serves people far beyond that membership, be obligated like a village shul or exempt like the city shul?
Author: False == 1 ? Anonymous : Yitzchak Falk #44;
According to the position of Rashi and Tosafot, in which a village shul is obligated a mezuzah and a city shul is not obligated because of viewing the ownership of the village shul as a partnership rather than corporate ownership, would a contemporary urban American shul that is clearly owned by the members of the shul, yet serves people far beyond that membership, be obligated like a village shul or exempt like the city shul?
Author: False == 1 ? Anonymous : Teacher Reply #44;
Thanks for reaching out! Nowadays, even city shuls typically have a defined membership and therefore can be characterized as having ××¢××× ×××××××. Bear in mind that Rashi and Tosfos understand that the פ××ר ××ת ××× ×¡×ª is driven by the criterion of ownership (based on this understanding of the second ××ת*×*, as per Tosfos 44a). [Please see as well the comment in the "Description" of this shiur on this page.] TC
Author: False == 1 ? Anonymous : Teacher Reply #44;
Thanks for reaching out! Nowadays, even city shuls typically have a defined membership and therefore can be characterized as having ××¢××× ×××××××. Bear in mind that Rashi and Tosfos understand that the פ××ר ××ת ××× ×¡×ª is driven by the criterion of ownership (based on this understanding of the second ××ת*×*, as per Tosfos 44a). [Please see as well the comment in the "Description" of this shiur on this page.] TC